Angles To Profit From A Land Investment

It will come as no surprise to those investing in land that achieving planning permission on a UK land site is where lies the most lucrative investment land returns, but there are other ways to make money from a land investment, writes Alex Way.

As a very broad guide, UK land which is reclassified for residential development within the UK land planning framework rises tenfold in value (ie land with planning permission is worth ten times more than a similar piece of land without planning permission). As such few other assets have the same capital growth potential as investment land. That is not to say that the average land investment returns 1000% to investors since to achieve growth on that scale from buying land would require that you undertake the project from start to finish yourself.

And many, if not most, people investing in land with a view to taking it through the land planning framework will need to employ somewhere down the line the services of UK land specialists, whose expertise does not necessarily come cheaply. However it is entirely possible to achieve investment land returns of the order of 350-600% because land developers are opening-up their projects to private investors.

The latter in effect provide partial land development funding to these firms in return for which those investors receive a pro rata proportion of the new value of the development land with planning permission. For the purposes of this article we will set to one side this fairly recent phenomenon (recent in the UK, at least - private land development finance is a well-established practice in the US), in order to consider other ways of profiting from investment land.

For more information Contact Nigel Walter at Connaught Asset Management.

An Analysis of Valley National Bancorp (VLY)

Valley National Bancorp (VLY) is a conservative bank with a strong position in northern New Jersey and a presence in Manhattan. The bank, founded in 1927, has about $12 billion in assets.

Valley has consistently earned extraordinary returns on assets and equity. Over the last twenty years, Valley has averaged a 1.74% return on assets and a 21.12% return on equity.

Valley’s worst two-year performance occurred in 1990 and 1991. During that period, Valley’s return on equity dropped as low as 14.54% and its ROA dropped as low as 1.29%. Even in Valley’s worst year (1991), the company still managed to roughly match the average long-term performance of most of its peers. In other words, Valley’s worst year was a close to typical year for many other banks.

It was at this low-point in 1991 that the board of directors decided not to increase the cash dividend. That was the only year in the last 37 that Valley did not increase its dividend.

The company has 79 consecutive years of profitable operations. That’s over 300 quarters (Valley has yet to post a quarterly loss). More importantly, Valley has a record of earning great returns on both assets and equity over long periods of time. So, what’s the company’s secret?

Location

Northern New Jersey is about the best place in the world to situate a bank. This isn’t hyperbole; if there’s a better location, I’ve yet to hear of it. As you know, American banks are unusually profitable. The market is large and highly fragmented. So, naturally the best place to situate a bank would be in the United States. But, why north Jersey in particular?

In a September 20th, 2001 interview with The Wall Street Transcript, Valley’s chairman, Gerald Lipkin, explained why northern New Jersey is such an attractive market:

“Northern New Jersey is the single most densely populated area on earth. There are more people per square mile in northern New Jersey than there are in India, China, Japan or anyplace else. We have the highest median family income in the United States in that area. So, we serve a very densely populated and affluent area, which is not dominated by any single industry.”

Focus

Valley maintains a narrow focus both in terms of geography and services. The company’s offices are kept within one hour of the bank’s headquarters in Wayne, NJ. In the same interview, Mr. Lipkin explained why this geographic concentration is important: “We like to make it very convenient for our client base to meet with senior management as well as the other members of our staff.”

Valley focuses on relationship banking. The company has residency requirements for its directors. The majority of directors are to live within 100 miles of the corporate headquarters. Furthermore, each board member is required to use Valley for both business and personal accounts. Theoretically, these two requirements ensure board members are familiar with the bank’s services and are best able to understand the needs of local businesses.

Discipline

Valley has a history of highly disciplined lending. Charge-offs are immaterial. Current reserves are adequate to cover many years of future charge-offs with little difficulty. The company’s asset quality ratios and loan to value ratios both indicate Valley has a more conservative approach to lending than many of its peers.

Undoubtedly, the local economy is helpful in this regard. Valley does not need to make questionable loans, because there is an abundance of opportunity in the local area. It is possible for the bank to remain fairly selective without forfeiting growth entirely. For instance, despite having $12 billion in assets, Valley only has about a 6% market share in northern New Jersey.

Management

Banking, like insurance, is a business where a particularly good or particularly poor management can greatly affect long-term results. The current Chairman, President, and CEO, Gerald Lipkin, has served for just over thirty years now. His record is unblemished.

Of course, the real responsibility for avoiding mistakes lies with others in the organization. There are few businesses where individual employees can do as much harm as they can within a bank. Valley’s past record and the level of experience of its top managers suggests investors should encounter very few unpleasant surprises resulting from human error.

Mr. Lipkin made his management philosophy quite clear with his concluding remarks in the aforementioned 2001 interview with The Wall Street Transcript:

“We never bet the ranch - we never put the bank in harms way on any single issue that could really harm it. Lending money is a risk taking business. So, obviously we at times have problems, situations with individual loans, but we try to avoid concentrations that could create major problems.”

Valuation

Valley National Bancorp is a solid, well-run bank operating in a geographic area with excellent economics. The company’s physical footprint and its existing relationships give it a narrow moat in a highly profitable (and increasingly competitive) region.

Unfortunately, the company is trading at more than three times book. Three times book is a lot to pay for any bank. Valley’s future growth will likely be somewhat restrained by the company’s conservative approach. Therefore, dividends are going to make up a significant portion of an investor’s total returns.

Conclusion

Valley is a good bank. It has a real moat, albeit a narrow one. Competition is increasing within Valley’s territory. However, the company has been able to compete successfully with new entrants (who tend to take on far less profitable business).

The stock isn’t cheap today, but there is one wrinkle worth keeping in mind. Valley is more dependent upon interest rate spreads than most banks. If the yield curve was to become significantly steeper, Valley would reap outsized rewards.

The current dividend yield on a share of Valley National Bancorp is a little less than 3.5%. Considering the company’s limited growth prospects, this is an unattractive yield. If, during a period of general uncertainty within the banking industry, shares of VLY were to trade closer to two times book, investors would have an opportunity to make a long-term commitment in a quality bank.

Copyright 2006 Geoff Gannon

Geoff Gannon writes a daily value investing blog and produces a twice weekly (half hour) value investing podcast at:
http://www.gannononinvesting.com

Portfolio Building Strategies for Stocks

Building a portfolio of stocks is not unlike building a
professional basketball team. You have to balance your supposed
superstars with a quality supporting cast, and you cannot
overload in one area. Balance, balance, balance. Especially if
you are like yours truly living off of your portfolio, wild
fluctuations, will kill your psyche, and your ability to operate
in a logical fashion. For us a stock portfolio consists of
around 10 holdings. For those of you who regularly trade along
with us at http://www.livingonlargecaps.blogspot.com, you know
that our holdings last for around four weeks. But even if you
hold stocks long term, or day trade, the philosophy of portfolio
building remains unchanged. The basketball analogy works if you
think about how many Michael Jordans you really need on one
team, the answer of course is one. At any given time, the stock
market will have a few hot sectors. Your superstars come from
these sectors, however, you can’t overload your portfolio with
stocks from these sectors because, when they fall out of favor,
which they often due without warning, your portfolio will skid
along with them. So what you need is a supporting cast to prop
up your superstar, when the game goes against them. Your
supporting cast likely will shine when your superstars are
crashing, they need to be complementary. An example that is
relevant right now is the energy sector, and more precisely oil.
Oil stocks have had a grand bull market, while the overall stock
market is treading water, the oil sector has been hot. However,
there have been corrections along the way. And one of these
days, it will be more than a correction, it will be a trend
reversal. It is very expensive to try to guess the trend
reversal, as you will be wrong along the way many, many times.
Especially in a pure sector like oil. The factors that lead to a
bull market in oil are easily identifiable, and the news coming
out is either bullish or bearish, it really needs very little
interpretation. Now take a sector like insurance. On first
glance the recent hurricanes should be bearish for insurance.
However, insurance also profits from favorable monetary policy
and interest rates curves. It is also a defensive sector so
traders will buy insurance when they are worried about future of
the stock market. In other words, there are many factors that go
into an insurance sector bull market. And to complicate it even
further, insurance companies do not move in lock step fashion
nearly as efficiently as pure industries like oil. Oil stocks
are like a well regimented military unit. Back to our example of
portfolio building, the oil sector’s bull market, has been
interrupted along the way. If you have been 100% in oil stocks
you actually would have done very well, however, your portfolio
would have had a tumultuous ride. A correction can last for up
to two weeks, and in that time your portfolio might have correct
up to 15%, a nail biting, ulcer inducing, dip in your net worth.
However, cushioning your oil stocks with say a stock that
upticks when the oil sector is going bearish on us, would have
resulted in a smoothing effect on your portfolio, and lessened
those nail biting periods filled with self-doubt, when you ask
why you even bother trading stocks, and that nine to five job
suddenly looks comforting. Some quick and fast rules we follow,
is no more than two holdings at any one time in related
sectors.. No more than 80% of our holdings are to be longs,
unless some longs actually go counter to the current trend. Such
as oil stocks, which actually are counter to the bulk of the
market. But if you have eight longs in say, insurance, banking,
retail, heavy machinery, technology, etc., then you must have
two shorts,. You will be surprised the smoothing effect that the
counter holdings provide. If you check your portfolio daily, and
let the gyrations effect your mood, it is important for clarity
of thought if nothing else. Always, always let the charts
decide, arm chair quarterbacking is expensive. Like guessing a
trend reversal, let the charts dictate and you trade
accordingly. In fact, I go so far as saying having an opinion is
expensive. I had thought oil was wildly over bought and highly
speculative for a long, long time. But the charts kept looking
good, so my opinion doesn’t really matter, only the facts
displayed in the charts do. And yes, sometimes they are wrong,
which is yet another reason to diversify.